
A 401(k) lawsuit filed against Bloomberg puts a familiar committee problem in plain view: what happens when allegedly underperforming funds stay in the menu year after year. The complaint points to two funds that allegedly lagged benchmarks and peers for a decade or longer, while participants kept sizable balances invested. Documented watch-list criteria, review cadence, and removal discipline can shape the full file.
#401k #ERISA #RetirementPlans #Fiduciary
#401k #ERISA #RetirementPlans #Fiduciary
Shared byShawn Raman - 7 days ago
Log in to comment
Loading ..
Related Articles
Beyond Plan Language: Comprehensive Behavioral Health Parity Review
Mastering Health Plan Oversight: Detailed Insights in HBL’s Monthly Newsletter
Detailed Review of Change-in-Control Language in M&A Transactions
Collaboration in Counsel, HR, and Finance: Enhancing Decision Making
Navigating Benefits Issues in M&A: Practical Case Studies for Business Teams
Uncover 401(k) Committee Insights: Tracking Funds, Fees, and Performance
0/100